Skip to content
Roadmap for Healthcare AI
Track 6

GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

6–8 weeks, coding optional

Test your knowledge15 questions on this track, with explanations

Read these five first

Landmark papers for this track, in reading order, from the papers list. Read each one critically with the 15-question checklist.

  1. Attention Is All You Need #227
    skim for attention
  2. Almanac — Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Clinical Medicine #230
    why grounding matters clinically
  3. Large language models propagate race-based medicine #233
    LLMs repeat medical myths
  4. Towards conversational diagnostic artificial intelligence #235
    agentic diagnostic dialogue and its simulation limits
  5. Ambient AI Scribes in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Trial #237
    RCT of the GenAI tool clinicians will meet first

Start here, free

The free-first path for this track from the free-resources addendum, in order.

  1. Building effective agents #129
  2. A practical guide to building agents (free PDF) #132
  3. Effective context engineering for AI agents #131
  4. Anthropic Academy — Introduction to MCP / MCP: Advanced Topics #134
  5. Introduction to Large Language Models (noc26_cs88) #149

Topics explained

Plain-language explanations for each topic. Examples are illustrative, not real cases.

1

LLM mechanics (tokens, embeddings, context)

In plain words

A large language model (LLM) reads and writes text in small pieces called tokens: whole words, parts of words or punctuation. Inside the model, each token is turned into a list of numbers called an embedding, which places words with similar meanings close together. The context window is everything the model can "see" at once: your instructions, any documents you paste in, and the conversation so far. Anything outside that window does not exist for the model.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

Imagine an intensivist pastes a long ICU stay, many days of notes, into a chatbot and asks for a summary. If the notes are longer than the context window, the earliest days may be cut off silently, and the summary will miss the admission diagnosis. A shorter, well-chosen extract often gives a better summary than everything at once.

A little more technical

The model works by predicting the most likely next token, one at a time, given the tokens already in its context. Embeddings are what let it treat "myocardial infarction" and "heart attack" as close in meaning even though the words differ. Because the model predicts rather than looks up, it can produce fluent text that is wrong, so every output still needs human verification before it informs clinical judgement.

Don't learn this yet

Skip the maths of attention and transformer layers, and skip training your own model. Knowing that text becomes tokens, tokens become numbers, and the model only sees its context window is enough for now.

2

RAG (chunking, vector DBs, citation grounding)

In plain words

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) means: before the model answers, the system first searches a trusted set of documents, pulls out the most relevant passages, and puts them into the model's context. The model then answers from those passages rather than from memory. Done well, the answer can point to exactly where each statement came from.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

Imagine an emergency department builds a tool over its own local protocols. A registrar asks, "What does our protocol say about imaging after a minor head injury in a patient on anticoagulants?" The system finds the relevant paragraphs, the model answers from them, and each sentence links back to the protocol section so the registrar can read the original before acting.

A little more technical

  • Chunking: long documents are split into smaller passages, because retrieval works best on focused pieces. Chunks that are too small lose context; too large and irrelevant text crowds in.
  • Vector database: each chunk is stored with its embedding, so the system can find passages close in meaning to the question, not just matching words.
  • Citation grounding: the model is instructed to answer only from the retrieved passages and to cite them, and to say so when the answer is not there.

RAG reduces invented content but does not remove it; the retrieval can miss the right passage, and the model can still misread it.

Don't learn this yet

Leave comparisons of retrieval algorithms, re-ranking and embedding models until you are actually building. Understand the three steps: split, search, answer with citations.

3

guideline-RAG project

In plain words

This is the hands-on project for the track: build a small question-answering tool over a set of clinical guidelines or local protocols, with every answer cited. The point is not to produce a finished product. It is to learn, by doing, where RAG works and where it fails.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

Imagine an anaesthesia department loads its own local pre-operative assessment guidance into a simple RAG tool. The trainee who builds it writes a list of test questions with known correct answers taken from the documents, including a few questions the documents do not cover. They then check whether each answer is correct, whether the citation really supports it, and whether the tool admits "not covered" instead of guessing.

A little more technical

A sensible project has four parts: a fixed, version-controlled document set; a chunking and retrieval step; a prompt that forces answers from retrieved text with citations; and a test set scored by a clinician. Common failures to look for are outdated documents, retrieval of the wrong section, answers that blend two guidelines, and confident answers to questions the documents never address. Use only documents you are allowed to use, and no patient data.

Don't learn this yet

Don't try to cover every guideline in your specialty, connect the tool to a live record system, or deploy it for clinical use. Keep it a learning exercise, reviewed against the evaluation habits from Track 3.

4

agents (tools, memory, planning)

In plain words

An agent is a language model that is allowed to take steps towards a goal, not just reply once. It can use tools (search, a calculator, another piece of software), keep memory of what it has done, and plan a sequence of steps, adjusting as results come in. The model decides what to do next, rather than a programmer fixing every step in advance.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

Imagine a general practice asks an agent to "prepare the list of patients due a medication review this month". The agent searches the appointment list, looks up each patient's current medicines, drafts a short summary for each, and flags ones it is unsure about. A clinician then reviews each summary before anything is booked or changed.

A little more technical

  • Tools: functions the model can call, each with a description of what it does; the model chooses when to call them.
  • Memory: short-term (what is in the current context window) and longer-term (notes saved and retrieved later).
  • Planning: breaking a goal into steps, checking results, and retrying or changing course.

Because an agent can act, its mistakes can compound across steps. In clinical settings, agents need approval checkpoints before any action that affects a patient. #129 recommends starting simple, and #132 covers when an agent is worth building at all.

Don't learn this yet

Skip comparing agent frameworks and multi-agent designs until you have understood a single agent with one or two tools.

5

MCP / A2A

In plain words

These are two agreed ways for AI systems to connect to other things. MCP (Model Context Protocol) is a protocol for connecting models to tools and data, so one tool can be plugged into many AI applications in the same way. A2A (the Agent2Agent protocol) is a protocol for agents to talk to each other, so an agent built one way can pass work to an agent built another way.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

Imagine a hospital's radiology department wraps its reporting-template library as an MCP tool, so any approved AI assistant can look up the correct template in the same way. Separately, imagine a referral-triage agent that uses A2A to hand a case to a scheduling agent built by a different team. In both cases, a human still approves what is sent to a patient's record or diary.

A little more technical

MCP separates the AI application (the client) from the thing providing tools or data (the server); #134 covers building servers and clients with tools, resources and prompts. A2A sits one level up: it lets whole agents exchange tasks. #60 builds three healthcare agents in different frameworks and connects them with A2A. Standard connections make building easier, but they also make it easier to give an AI access to more than it should have, so access needs deliberate limits.

Don't learn this yet

You don't need the transport details or advanced protocol features. Understand what each protocol connects, and who controls the permissions.

6

human-in-the-loop vs human-on-the-loop

In plain words

Human-in-the-loop means a person must approve each output or action before it takes effect. Human-on-the-loop means the system acts on its own while a person watches, and can step in or stop it. The first is slower but safer; the second relies on the watcher noticing problems in time.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

  • In the loop: an AI drafts a discharge summary on a medical ward, and nothing is sent until the doctor has read, edited and signed it.
  • On the loop: imagine a system that automatically sorts incoming non-urgent referrals into clinic lists, while a consultant reviews a daily report and can move any referral.

For anything that directly changes a patient's treatment, in-the-loop is the safe default.

A little more technical

On-the-loop supervision is vulnerable to automation bias and alert fatigue (Track 3): if the system is usually right, people stop checking. Good designs make review easy, show the evidence behind each output, log every action, and let the human undo it. Which model is acceptable depends on how much harm a wrong action could cause and how quickly it could be caught.

Don't learn this yet

Skip the research literature on human–AI teaming. Hold on to one question for any tool: who approves what, and before or after it happens?

7

agent evaluation and guardrails

In plain words

Evaluation means testing whether an agent does the right thing, not just whether its final answer sounds right. Guardrails are the limits built around it: what it may and may not do, which inputs it rejects, and which actions need a human's approval. Both are needed, because agents take several steps and can go wrong at any of them.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

Imagine a critical care unit testing an agent that drafts handover summaries. The team runs it on a set of de-identified practice cases and a clinician checks each step: did it pull the right results, miss any, or invent any? Guardrails stop it writing into the record, block it from recommending treatment, and send any summary it flags as uncertain to a senior for review.

A little more technical

Agent evaluation looks at the final output, the path taken (which tools it called, in what order), and failure behaviour (what it does when a tool fails or the answer is not available). Guardrails can check inputs, check outputs, restrict tools and require approvals; #132 describes guardrail types. Evaluation continues after launch through logging and monitoring, because behaviour can change when inputs, tools or the model change.

Don't learn this yet

Leave automated evaluation tooling and observability platforms until you are building. First learn to write a test set of realistic cases and judge them as a clinician would.

8

the distinction: assistant ≠ workflow automation ≠ agent ≠ autonomous clinical system

In plain words

These four are often lumped together as "AI", but they differ in who decides and who acts.

  • Assistant: you ask, it answers, you decide what to do. It takes no action itself.
  • Workflow automation: a fixed sequence of steps a person designed in advance; AI may do one step, such as summarising, but the path never changes.
  • Agent: the model chooses its own steps and tools to reach a goal, within limits.
  • Autonomous clinical system: a system that makes and carries out clinical decisions without a clinician approving each one.

Healthcare example (illustrative)

Imagine a pre-operative clinic. An assistant answers a nurse's question about a local fasting policy. Workflow automation takes each new booking, has AI summarise the referral letter, and files the summary for review. An agent is told "prepare this week's clinic" and decides for itself which records to check and what to flag. An autonomous clinical system would cancel or proceed with a patient's surgery on its own, which is a very different level of risk.

A little more technical

#129 draws the key line: workflows follow predefined code paths, while agents are directed by the model. Risk rises with each step along the list, because the human moves further from each decision. The safe chain stays the same throughout: AI output → human verification → clinical judgement → action. The further right a system sits, the stronger the evaluation, guardrails, approvals and governance it needs.

Don't learn this yet

Don't try to design an autonomous clinical system. Learn to recognise which of the four a product actually is, whatever its marketing calls it.

Resources for this track

Every resource here has had its link and relevance checked, except those tagged “Link not machine-checked”. “Not listed” means the detail wasn't stated or couldn't be confirmed.

Type
Depth
Coding
Focus
Era
Cost
Region

Entries that don't state a value only appear when that filter is set to “Any”. “Free only” shows entries whose cost is stated as free, plus everything from the free-resources addendum.

Showing 38 of 38
#60
A2A: The Agent2Agent Protocol
DeepLearning.AI, built with Google Cloud and IBM Research (instructors Holt Skinner, Ivan Nardini, Sandi Besen)
CourseBuildLLM-eraHealthcare-specific

Build three healthcare agents in different frameworks (ADK, LangGraph with an MCP server, BeeAI), wrap them in A2A servers, run sequential and hierarchical workflows, deploy to BeeAI Agent Stack. LLM+/MCP/A2A.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
Short course (DLAI short courses: ~1–2 h)
Level
Int
Cert
Not listed
More details
Format
Short course
Code
Y (Python)
Maths
Not listed
HC
Y (healthcare multi-agent build)
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#61
Document AI: From OCR to Agentic Doc Extraction
DeepLearning.AI + LandingAI
CourseBuildLLM-eraGeneral AI

OCR limits, layout/reading-order agents, LandingAI ADE with visual grounding, schema extraction, serverless RAG on AWS. LLM+.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
Short
Level
Int
Cert
Not listed
More details
Format
Short course
Code
Y
Maths
Not listed
HC
G (directly relevant to scanned records/lab reports)
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#62
DeepLearning.AI short-course catalog (agent evaluation/observability with NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit; DSPy+MLflow agent debugging; LangGraph long-term memory; event-driven document workflows with RAG and human-in-the-loop; Claude Code; structured outputs with Pydantic; Box MCP + A2A)
DeepLearning.AI
CourseEvaluateBuildGeneral AI

These are the evaluation, human-in-the-loop and MCP nodes for Track 6. Exact titles to be confirmed per page.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
~1–2 h each
Level
Int
Cert
Not listed
More details
Format
Short courses
Code
Y
Maths
Not listed
HC
G
Depth
B, E

Resource-list status: V (catalog level)
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#63
Hugging Face LLM Course
Hugging Face
BuildLLM-eraGeneral AI

Transformers, datasets, tokenizers, fine-tuning/LoRA, dataset curation, reasoning models/GRPO. LLM+.

Cost
Free
Duration
Not stated
Level
Int
Cert
Chapter-level certificate pages (intro text contradicts)
More details
Format
Self-paced
Code
Y
Maths
Some
HC
G
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#64
Hugging Face Agents Course
Hugging Face
BuildGeneral AI

Agent fundamentals; smolagents, LlamaIndex, LangGraph; final benchmark challenge. Launched early 2025.

Cost
Free
Duration
~3–4 h/week, 1 week per unit
Level
Int
Cert
Fundamentals certificate (Unit 1 ≥80%) + completion certificate
More details
Format
Self-paced
Code
Y
Maths
Not listed
HC
G
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#65
Hugging Face MCP Course (with Anthropic)
Hugging Face
BuildGeneral AI

MCP architecture, end-to-end app, deployed app. Announced 15 May 2025 (MarkTechPost); built in partnership with Anthropic; authors Ben Burtenshaw (Hugging Face) and Alex Notov (Anthropic).

Cost
Free
Duration
Not stated
Level
Int
Cert
Certificates (Units 1 and 3)
More details
Format
Self-paced
Code
Y
Maths
Not listed
HC
G
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#66
Generative AI for Beginners (21 lessons)
Microsoft
GitHubUnderstandBuildGeneral AI

Prompting, chat, RAG/embeddings, agents, security; Python/TypeScript. README notes GitHub Models retires end of July 2026 (use Microsoft Foundry Models instead).

Cost
Free
Duration
21 lessons
Level
Beg–Int
Cert
None
More details
Format
GitHub lessons
Code
Y
Maths
Not listed
HC
G
Depth
U, B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#67
Azure AI Fundamentals (AI-900 → AI-901)
Microsoft
UnderstandGeneral AI

AI-900 retired 30 Jun 2026; the certification is now earned via AI-901.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
Not listed
Level
Beginner
Cert
Certification (no renewal)
More details
Format
Proctored exam
Code
N
Maths
Not listed
HC
G
Depth
U

Resource-list status: V (INR F)
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#68
IBM RAG and Agentic AI Professional Certificate
IBM / Coursera
BuildLLM-eraGeneral AI

RAG, vector DBs, advanced retrievers, multimodal, LangChain/LangGraph, CrewAI/AutoGen/BeeAI; ends with MCP. LLM+.

Cost
Coursera subscription; in Coursera Plus
Duration
8 weeks at 3 h/week
Level
Advanced
Cert
IBM Professional Certificate + Credly badge
More details
Format
Self-paced
Code
Y
Maths
Some
HC
G
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#69
AI and Agentic AI in Healthcare (JHU, with Great Learning)
Johns Hopkins University
UnderstandUseLeadLLM-eraHealthcare-specific

R.O.A.D. management framework, CDS, disease management, business strategy, 3 masterclasses (implementation, trends, workflow automation). Per the blog, also EHR integration, revenue cycle and governance. LLM+/agents.

Cost
Not captured
Duration
Not listed
Level
Beg–Int
Cert
Not listed
More details
Format
Online: recorded lectures + live masterclasses + mentorship
Code
N
Maths
Not listed
HC
Y
Depth
U, Us, L

Resource-list status: V (9 vs 10 weeks conflict)
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#70
Certificate Program in Agentic AI
JHU + Great Learning
BuildGeneral AI

Prompt engineering foundations through agent frameworks.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
16 weeks
Level
Int
Cert
JHU certificate
More details
Format
Online live + self-paced
Code
Y (Python pre-work)
Maths
Not listed
HC
G
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#71
AI and Agentic AI Engineering Certificate
JHU + Great Learning
BuildGeneral AI

MLOps/LLMOps, CI/CD, observability, vector DBs; LangChain, LangGraph, OpenAI APIs, Claude workflows, Azure AI Studio, Bedrock, SageMaker; 3 projects.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
Not listed
Level
Adv
Cert
Certificate
More details
Format
Online
Code
Y
Maths
Not listed
HC
G (22+ cases incl. healthcare)
Depth
B

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#72
JHU/Great Learning catalog: Applied Generative AI (16 wk); Generative AI & Agents Fundamentals (8 wk); AI Business Strategy (10 wk); AI: Applied ML, GenAI and Agents (5 months)
JHU
UseEvaluateBuildGeneral AI

Catalog listing only.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
As listed
Level
Various
Cert
Certificates
More details
Format
Online
Code
Various
Maths
Not listed
HC
G
Depth
Us–B

Resource-list status: V (listing)
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#73
AI in Medicine II (BMIF 203 / BMI 702), Spring 2026
Harvard Medical School (Marinka Zitnik)
CourseEvaluateBuildHealthcare-specific

Multimodal, generative and agentic AI on real clinical and biological data; benchmarking and human-AI evaluation loops; responsible implementation. The best current syllabus template for Track 6 evaluation.

Cost
Enrolled students
Duration
Semester
Level
Adv
Cert
Credit
More details
Format
Graduate course (public site)
Code
Y
Maths
Y
HC
Y
Depth
B, E

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#74Link not machine-checked
AI for Health and Healthcare
NUS Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health
UseHealthcare-specific

Hands-on prompt engineering, RAG and AI-agent workflows for clinicians and administrators. A regional model.

Cost
Not listed
Duration
2 days (9–10 Jul 2026, already past)
Level
Beginner
Cert
Not listed
More details
Format
In-person (Singapore)
Code
N
Maths
Not listed
HC
Y
Depth
Us

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: GenAI, RAG and agents in healthcare

Link not machine-checked · Details researched: 26 Sep 2026Report a problem
#95
Karpathy.ai (hub page: Zero to Hero + general-audience tracks)
Andrej Karpathy
Official docUnderstandBuildLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

The creator's own index. It points to the general-audience track (Deep Dive) and the technical Zero to Hero playlist.

Type
official doc
Year
ongoing
Duration/length
page
Level
Beginner→Adv
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
Opt
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T0 → T5/T6
Depth
Understand/Build

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 0: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#102
Anthropic Learn hub
Anthropic
Official docUseLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

Free courses, tutorials and use cases from Anthropic's education team, including AI Fluency courses and an Introduction to Model Context Protocol (MCP) course.

Now called Claude Academy (the Anthropic Learn address redirects here). Its MCP courses are why it is also listed on Track 6.

Type
official doc
Year
2026
Duration/length
hub
Level
Beginner
Currency
LLM-era

Official page (found 2026-09-28): https://academy.claude.com/

More details
Coding
N
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T1 / tool literacy
Depth
Use

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 1: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-28 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#126
MIT 6.S191 Lecture 6 — Language Models and New Frontiers
MIT (Ava Amini)
VideoUnderstandLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

LLMs and the current frontier.

Type
video
Year
2026
Duration/length
~1 h
Level
Int
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
N
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T5→T6 bridge
Depth
Understand

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 5: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#129
Building effective agents
Anthropic
ArticleUnderstandBuildLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

Separates workflows (predefined code paths) from agents (LLM-directed). Patterns covered: prompt chaining, routing, parallelisation, orchestrator-workers, evaluator-optimiser. Recommends starting simple.

Type
article (engineering blog)
Year
Dec 2024
Duration/length
long read
Level
Int
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
Opt
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T6 / agents: workflows vs agents
Depth
Understand/Build

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#130
Building more effective AI agents (single video)
Anthropic (Alex Albert with co-author Erik)
VideoUnderstandLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

Discussion with a co-author of the blog post above on when agents are worth building.

Type
video
Year
2025
Duration/length
~30–40 min
Level
Int
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
N
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T6 / agents
Depth
Understand

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#131
Effective context engineering for AI agents
Anthropic
ArticleBuildLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

Treats context engineering as the successor to prompt engineering: curating which tokens enter the context window over long agent runs.

Type
article
Year
2025
Duration/length
long read
Level
Int–Adv
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
Opt
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T6 / RAG & context management
Depth
Build

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#132
A practical guide to building agents (free PDF)
OpenAI
Official docUnderstandBuildLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

Covers when to build an agent (complex judgement, brittle rules, unstructured data), the model + tools + instructions breakdown, manager vs handoff multi-agent patterns, and guardrail types.

Type
official doc
Year
2025
Duration/length
34 pp
Level
Beginner–Int
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
Opt
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T6 / agents; guardrails
Depth
Understand/Build

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#133
A practical guide to building agents (landing page)
OpenAI
Official docUnderstandLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

HTML version of the guide above.

Type
official doc
Year
2025
Duration/length
web version
Level
Beginner–Int
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
Opt
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T6 / agents
Depth
Understand

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#134
Anthropic Academy — Introduction to MCP / MCP: Advanced Topics
Anthropic
CourseBuildLLM-eraGeneral AIFree (addendum)

Build MCP servers and clients (tools, resources, prompts), test them with the Inspector, then cover sampling, notifications, roots and StreamableHTTP transport.

⚠ Check currency — the resource list flags this entry (see the fields marked ⚠).

Type
course (free)
Year
2025–2026
Duration/length
~1–4 h each
Level
Int–Adv
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
Y (Python)
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T6 / MCP
Depth
Build

Resource-list status: V ⚠ free registration
Listed under: Track 6: Free resources (addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026)

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#149
Introduction to Large Language Models (noc26_cs88)
IIT Delhi & IIT Bombay — Tanmoy Chakraborty, Soumen Chakrabarti
MOOCUnderstandBuildLLM-eraGeneral AIIndiaFree (addendum)

India's main free LLM course.

Type
MOOC
Year
Jan–Jun 2026
Duration/length
12 weeks
Level
Int–Adv
Currency
LLM-era
More details
Coding
Y
HC-specific
General
Track/node
T6 / LLMs
Depth
Understand/Build

Resource-list status: S
Listed under: India cross-cutting — NPTEL/SWAYAM (all free to audit; certification optional) — free addendum, verified 26 Sep 2026

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-26Report a problem
#227
Attention Is All You Need
Vaswani A et al.
PaperUnderstandOpen access

Introduced the transformer behind every LLM

Journal
NeurIPS (arXiv)
Year
2017
DOI
Not confirmed
Paper type
Methods

DOI (confirmed 2026-09-27): https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.03762

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Likely (preprint)
Track and node
T6 · Transformer foundations
Depth level
Understand
Currency note
Historical anchor

Resource-list status: S
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#228
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks
Lewis P et al.
PaperBuildOpen access

The original RAG paper

Journal
NeurIPS (arXiv)
Year
2020
DOI
Not confirmed
Paper type
Methods

DOI (confirmed 2026-09-27): https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11401

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.11401

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Likely (preprint)
Track and node
T6 · RAG foundations
Depth level
Build
Currency note
Foundational

Resource-list status: S
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#229
Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models
Singhal K et al.
PaperUnderstandLLM-eraOpen access

Peer-reviewed Med-PaLM 2; physician-preferred answers on most axes

Journal
Nature Medicine
Year
2025
Paper type
Model development / validation

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03423-7.pdf

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Yes – PMC11922739
Track and node
T6 · Medical LLMs
Depth level
Understand
Currency note
LLM-era; methods current

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#230
Almanac — Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Clinical Medicine
Zakka C et al.
PaperBuildLLM-eraOpen access

314 clinical questions: retrieval improved factuality and safety over ChatGPT-4, Bing and Bard

Journal
NEJM AI
Year
2024
Paper type
Validation

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10857783/pdf/nihms-1962112.pdf

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Not confirmed (preprint version free in PMC)
Track and node
T6 · RAG in medicine
Depth level
Build
Currency note
LLM-era; landmark clinical RAG

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#231
Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medicine
Xiong G et al.
PaperBuildLLM-eraOpen access

MIRAGE benchmark comparing retrievers and corpora

Journal
Findings of ACL (arXiv 2402.13178 as found)
Year
2024
DOI
Not confirmed
Paper type
Benchmark

DOI (confirmed 2026-09-27): https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.372

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.372.pdf

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Likely (preprint)
Track and node
T6 · RAG evaluation
Depth level
Build
Currency note
LLM-era

Resource-list status: S
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#232
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ji Z et al.
PaperUnderstandLLM-eraPaywalled

Standard taxonomy of hallucination types

Journal
ACM Computing Surveys
Year
2023
DOI
Not confirmed
Paper type
Narrative review

DOI (confirmed 2026-09-27): https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Likely (arXiv version)
Track and node
T6 · Hallucination
Depth level
Understand
Currency note
LLM-era

Resource-list status: S
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#233
Large language models propagate race-based medicine
Omiye JA et al.
PaperEvaluateLLM-eraOpen access

Four commercial LLMs repeated debunked race-based claims

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Year
2023
Paper type
Cross-sectional audit

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00939-z.pdf

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Yes – CC BY
Track and node
T6 · LLM bias
Depth level
Evaluate
Currency note
LLM-era (npj Digit Med, not Lancet Digit Health)

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#234· also listed as #27
The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models
Gallifant J et al.
PaperEvaluateOpen access

19 items and 50 subitems; living guideline for LLM studies

Journal
Nature Medicine
Year
2025
Paper type
Reporting guideline

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03425-5.pdf

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Yes – accepted manuscript on Oxford ORA
Track and node
T6 · LLM evaluation standards (cross-list T3)
Depth level
Evaluate
Currency note
Current

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#235
Towards conversational diagnostic artificial intelligence
Tu T et al.
PaperEvaluateLLM-eraOpen access

AMIE outperformed PCPs in text-chat OSCEs with patient-actors; simulated setting only

Journal
Nature
Year
2025
Paper type
Randomised crossover (simulated OSCE)

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08866-7.pdf

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Not confirmed
Track and node
T6 · Diagnostic agents
Depth level
Evaluate
Currency note
LLM-era; follow-ups in Nat Med 2026 (10.1038/s41591-026-04371-0) and Nature 2026 (10.1038/s41586-026-10764-5)

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#236
LLM-based agentic systems in medicine and healthcare
Qiu J et al.
PaperUnderstandLLM-eraPaywalled

Clinician-accessible framing of agentic LLM systems

Journal
Nature Machine Intelligence
Year
2024
Paper type
Perspective

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Not confirmed
Track and node
T6 · Agents
Depth level
Understand
Currency note
LLM-era

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#237
Ambient AI Scribes in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Trial
Lukac PJ et al.
PaperEvaluateLLM-eraOpen access

238 physicians, DAX vs Nabla vs usual care; the first RCT evidence on scribes

Journal
NEJM AI
Year
2025
Paper type
RCT

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12768499/

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Yes – PMC12768499
Track and node
T6 · Ambient scribes (cross-list T7)
Depth level
Evaluate
Currency note
LLM-era; current

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#238
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Ambient Artificial Intelligence to Improve Health Practitioner Well-Being
Afshar M et al.
PaperEvaluateLLM-eraOpen access

66 practitioners; burnout/fulfilment co-primary outcomes

Journal
NEJM AI
Year
2025
Paper type
RCT (stepped-wedge)

Free full text (Unpaywall, 2026-09-27): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12858090/

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Not confirmed
Track and node
T6 · Ambient scribes
Depth level
Evaluate
Currency note
LLM-era; current

Resource-list status: V
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem
#239
Creation and Adoption of Large Language Models in Medicine
Shah NH et al.
PaperLeadLLM-eraPaywalled

Clinicians must shape LLM training and evaluation

Journal
JAMA
Year
2023
DOI
Not confirmed
Paper type
Special communication

DOI (confirmed 2026-09-27): https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.14217

Read this critically → the 15-question checklist

More details
Open-access status
Not confirmed
Track and node
T6 · Who builds medical LLMs
Depth level
Lead
Currency note
LLM-era

Resource-list status: S
Listed under: Track 6: Papers — GenAI, RAG & agents in healthcare

Link checked: 2026-09-27 · Details researched: 2026-09-27Report a problem